From owner-cvs-all Mon Nov 8 7:27:16 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758CF14CA9; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 07:27:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 647891C2B; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 09:29:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60785381B; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 09:29:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 09:29:04 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami , Mark Murray , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/mod_perl - Imported sources In-Reply-To: <39819.942057652@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > I must admit, I'm pretty sure you're right, because I still don't > understand why p5-Apache's history would be interesting in this case. > Can you explain what history is worth preserving, or should we just ask > every time we're in doubt without making a judgement call? p5-Apache was really modperl in disguise, your port is modperl. That's why they're related and useful to someone. "We didn't have modperl until 3.4-RELEASE?" "No, we had it but it was broken beyond belief" "oh" -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message