From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 15:09:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE5D106564A for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from biancalana@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823978FC17 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:09:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnp1 with SMTP id p1so11248389ggn.13 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 07:09:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1DvYeCLd/Y2mB5Lv/Wwpo2jFkKTXGZj5fkO+9j3VV0Y=; b=jML2Fwa1z/zwMpI5CPbhvWQQFfryRkpXubpUvsz3eJ+iMJBgxXdEPRqhZdw+8tL2SR 0jLvhfgLUTwUWBqmrnPMJveLj6nK0Do0CGGvOCF32xeSkgvNIvxdIfffKfVQBxrUE+Vl hEDJu5qAUiMXJXfONpEW9hm6FrHScstLle1iY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.178.9 with SMTP id e9mr37807943yhm.77.1324997274030; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 06:47:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.147.76.13 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 06:47:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:47:54 -0200 Message-ID: From: Alexandre Biancalana To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: FreeBSD EC2 Status X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:09:56 -0000 Hi lists, What=B4s is the current state of FreeBSD running on Amazon EC2 ? Is this stable ? Looking at Colin's status page (http://www.daemonology.net/freebsd-on-ec2/) looks like there=B4s no active development on that. Does someone running production workload with FreeBSD on EC2 ? I'm interested in running network (dns and http with accept filter) and memory/buffer cache intensive applications on m1.small, m1.large and m2.xlarge instances. Any thoughts ? Best Regards and Happy New Year ! Alexandre