From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 12:59:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD801065697; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:59:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7948FC0C; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:59:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375071FFC38; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:59:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 042FD8452E; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:59:52 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Ilya Bakulin References: <86wrry1hwv.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20100828130912.48205a47@kibab.com> <20100828195024.3d671a76@kibab.com> <20100828204415.6875b4ec@kibab.com> <86bp8kjr7i.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20100830155638.710f8871@kibab-work.smstraffic.ru> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:59:52 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20100830155638.710f8871@kibab-work.smstraffic.ru> (Ilya Bakulin's message of "Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:56:38 +0400") Message-ID: <86eidgi7cn.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: geom@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Support for WD Advanced Format disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:59:54 -0000 Ilya Bakulin writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > > Why did you shift the gnop? Did you short jumper 7-8? > No, 7-8 remained as-is. ad7p1 was created using: > #gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -s 10G -b 63 ad7=20 > > So it begins at sector #63, but physical 4096-block begins at logical > sector 64. That's why I shifted gnop by 1 sector. Why aren't you using the whole disk? > > Yes. WD Green disks suck. > Is it a problem of WD Green or it is common to all 4096-sector models? WD Green, even their non-AF disks (like the WD20EADS I tested) suck. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no