From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 15 14:59:14 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EF26416A4B3; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6178143FDD; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru)
Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by nagual.pp.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h9FLxAgI043330;
	Thu, 16 Oct 2003 01:59:11 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru)
Received: (from ache@localhost)
	by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id h9FLxAnW043329;
	Thu, 16 Oct 2003 01:59:10 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from ache)
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 01:59:08 +0400
From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>
Message-ID: <20031015215907.GA43137@nagual.pp.ru>
References: <20031015133634.GA37556@nagual.pp.ru>
	<43618.1066226536@critter.freebsd.dk> <20031015152102.GB38522@nagual.pp.ru>
	<xzpn0c28dpe.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20031015203428.GA42399@nagual.pp.ru>
	<xzpismq8blw.fsf@dwp.des.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <xzpismq8blw.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
cc: doc@FreeBSD.org
cc: developers@FreeBSD.org
cc: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: hiding e-mail adresses needed badly
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 21:59:15 -0000

On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 22:55:23 +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:

> score MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE 5.0

I already reject all executable attachments using sentinel.

> score RAZOR2_CHECK 5.0
> score DCC_CHECK 2.5

When I play with SpamAssassin before, I use something like that. It not
helps much since spammers tends to write completely new texts each time
nowdays and obfuscate words to not much even fuzzy checksums.

In any case, I don't want this discussion to turn into 'how to prevent 
current SPAM', I handle it well (99% rejected at the milter level, but 1% 
still is big enough). My point of view is: if spammer don't have my 
address, it can't do even 1%.

-- 
Andrey Chernov | http://ache.pp.ru/