From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 5 06:08:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140E7106566B for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 06:08:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C8E8FC14 for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 06:08:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NGnop-0006On-9b for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 07:08:35 +0100 Received: from pool-71-166-130-168.washdc.east.verizon.net ([71.166.130.168]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 07:08:35 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-71-166-130-168.washdc.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 07:08:35 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 01:08:04 -0500 Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <4B18CD57.5090108@tomahawk.com.sg> <20091204193219.GA84026@dan.emsphone.com> <4B19EC94.8040901@tomahawk.com.sg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-71-166-130-168.washdc.east.verizon.net User-Agent: KNode/4.3.4 Sender: news Subject: Re: malformed man pages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 06:08:40 -0000 Sagara Wijetunga wrote: [snip] > > We use /usr/bin/less from ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/less, the > less-382.tar.gz, unpatched. Why? > Does the less need to be patched in FreeBSD? If so, is there such a > patch exist? > Uhmm, this may sound a little strange, but why not use the one included as part of the system? In other words, there was no need to 'install' less. Remove whatever you installed and use the right one. It even has a man page, e.g., man less and you will see a man page for the included one unless you've made a total mess of your man pages. I suspect there may be a possibility of bringing "Linuxisms" to your approach to FreeBSD. While there may be some amount of crossover, FreeBSD is not Linux. Learn FreeBSD as if it were new to you and leave the Linuxisms aside. -Mike