From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 1 05:04:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FCE16ADC7 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 05:04:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from mrout1.yahoo.com (mrout1.yahoo.com [216.145.54.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6644643CA2 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 05:04:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from minion.local.neville-neil.com (proxy8.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.48.13]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id kB1541NI052174; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:04:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:38:08 +0900 Message-ID: From: "George V. Neville-Neil" To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: <1299.1164923821@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <1299.1164923821@critter.freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.0.90 (i386-apple-darwin8.8.1) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Ivan Voras , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a proposed callout API X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 05:04:43 -0000 At Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:57:01 +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > I'm not going to dissect Matts emails because that will just lead > to a long an pointless flamewar. > > Most of Matts emails focus on the specifics of implementation whereas > I have repeatedly stressed that my focus is on defining a good API > for programmers to use which will allow us to isolate the implemetation > so we can experiment with different strategies. > > I will work with John to write up our spec and we will publish that > along with the reasoning soon. > Excellent. That will give us something more substantial to chew on. Thanks, George