From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 09:25:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63238DD8 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 09:25:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-in-3.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (vm299.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de [131.173.16.215]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC4B410EA for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 09:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-auth.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (vm136.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de [131.173.16.11]) by mail-in-3.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4C9PWDY022024 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 May 2015 11:25:32 +0200 Received: from spock.drpetervoigt.private (p5DC4C58C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.196.197.140]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-auth.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t4C9PU3r030153 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 May 2015 11:25:31 +0200 Received: from kirk.drpetervoigt.private (kirk.drpetervoigt.private [192.168.1.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pvoigt) by spock.drpetervoigt.private (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74FDD4A03403; Tue, 12 May 2015 11:25:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 11:25:05 +0200 From: "Dr. Peter Voigt" To: Yuri Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: www/firefox really depends on security/openssl? Message-ID: <20150512112505.5f36f0b2@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> In-Reply-To: <55515251.5040503@rawbw.com> References: <20150509125643.0bda93e6@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <554EEBB5.8010304@rawbw.com> <20150511202110.34e6e29c@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <55510C22.9050900@rawbw.com> <20150512000259.32a44ec4@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <55512E8F.8040508@rawbw.com> <20150512022857.7230c163@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <55515251.5040503@rawbw.com> Organization: =?UTF-8?B?VW5pdmVyc2l0w6R0IE9zbmFicsO8Y2s=?= X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.5.12.91219 (Univ. Osnabrueck) X-PMX-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report= HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_2999 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, FROM_NAME_PHRASE 0, RDNS_POOLED 0, RDNS_SUSP 0, RDNS_SUSP_SPECIFIC 0, REFERENCES 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __RDNS_POOLED_10 0, __REFERENCES 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __URI_NO_PATH 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0 X-PMX-Spam-Level: IIIIIIII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 09:25:37 -0000 On Mon, 11 May 2015 18:07:29 -0700 Yuri wrote: > On 05/11/2015 17:28, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote: > > What is wrong with my system? Why does porttree need port openssl as > > well. It is obviosuly wrong. If I build ports-mgmt/porttree from > > source, there is not dependency from port openssl. Might there be > > something wrong with my package database? How can I fix? > > Python depends on openssl. > > # porttree ports-mgmt/porttree > Depending on > 0 +ports-mgmt/porttree > 1 ++lang/python27 > 2 |++devel/libffi > 3 ||`print/indexinfo > 4 |+devel/ncurses > 5 |+devel/pkgconf > 6 |`+security/openssl > 7 | `lang/perl5.16 > 8 `+math/py-networkx > 9 ++devel/py-setuptools27 > |`+lang/python27 -> 1 > `+lang/python27 -> 1 > > You won't be able to remove port openssl. > > Yuri Hm, I do not have port openssl installed at all: # pkg version |grep -i openssl php56-openssl-5.6.8 = py27-openssl-0.14 = And moreover, on my system (10.1-RELEASE, amd64) I have: # porttree ports-mgmt/porttree Depending on 0 +ports-mgmt/porttree 1 ++lang/python27 2 |++devel/gettext-runtime 3 ||+converters/libiconv 4 ||`print/indexinfo 5 |++devel/gettext-tools ||+converters/libiconv -> 3 ||++devel/gettext-runtime -> 2 ||+print/indexinfo -> 4 6 ||`textproc/expat2 7 |++devel/libffi ||`print/indexinfo -> 4 8 |+devel/ncurses 9 |`devel/pkgconf 10 `+math/py-networkx 11 ++devel/py-setuptools27 |`+lang/python27 -> 1 `+lang/python27 -> 1 Therefore I conclude: - Installing binary packages with pkg does not honor the WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes switch. Is there another place to tell pkg to use base openssl when doing binary installations? - If port openssl is not present on a system, any dependency to openssl is not detected by porttree. Peter