From owner-freebsd-current Tue Mar 18 15:22:22 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA09796 for current-outgoing; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 15:22:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA09787 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 15:22:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from rover.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rover.village.org (8.8.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA02281; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 16:21:53 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199703182321.QAA02281@rover.village.org> To: The Hermit Hacker Subject: Re: 2.2 Kernel Unstable Cc: current@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 18 Mar 1997 15:09:15 -0400." References: Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 16:21:52 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message The Hermit Hacker writes: : Well, -RELEASE isn't stable, that's for sure. Something like 3 : crash/reboots in the past 12 hours or so?? I've put in a bug report for : each of the last two, as there seemed to have been *some* information : available from the core, but this recent one doesn't seem to give *any* : information. I someone can tell me what information would be useful to : grab out of the core files from this, I'd be more then happy to produce it, : as I'm holding onto the core files for as long as possible, and/or in relation : to the other two bug reports created... I saw something similar last night when I did a sudo reboot while running X. It was for a lock in ufs. I thought I had posted to -hackers, but haven't seen it come back yet. I was runing a -current kernel as of Mar 14 and thought that it was just the post Lite-2 blues. I didn't get a good traceback because gdb didn't have any symbols. When I did gdb's job by hand, it showed the following traceback: #0 0xf0111fb3 in boot () #1 0xf0112272 in panic () #2 0xf01b9956 in trap_fatal () #3 0xf01b9444 in trap_pfault () #4 0xf01b911f in trap () #5 0xf010d660 in lockstatus () #6 0xf01a1bfd in ufs_islocked () + 0x15 #7 0xf0131d78 in vfs_msync () + 0x38 #8 0xf0132704 in sync () + 0x4c #9 0xf0111e7d in boot () + 0x75 #10 0xf0112272 in panic () #11 0xf01b9956 in trap_fatal () #12 0xf01b9444 in trap_pfault () #13 0xf01b911f in trap () #14 0xf010d660 in lockstats () #15 0xf01a1bfd in ufs_islocked () + 0x15 #16 0xf0131d78 in vfs_msync () + 0x38 #17 0xf0132704 in sync () + 0x4c #18 0xf012d58b in vfs_update () + 0x3b #19 0xf0107ab6 in kproc_start () + 0x32 #20 0xf0107a54 in main () So I've rebuilt the kernel -g and rebooted with a Mar 17 kernel. We'll see if this is more stable or not. BTW, is it a bad sign when you have lunch with a -core member and he says you are a lot braver than he for running a post lite-2 merge -current? Warner P.S. No, the same traceback on the screen twice isn't a typo!