Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 18:44:07 +0100 From: Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r376393 - in head/dns: dnswall nslint tinystats vizone zonenotify Message-ID: <20150106184407.f0063f82e5ad6cc6f654338f@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20150106153109.GA93278@FreeBSD.org> References: <201501060937.t069bSxD097911@svn.freebsd.org> <20150106153109.GA93278@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 09:37:28AM +0000, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > > New Revision: 376393 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/376393 > > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r376393/ > > > > Log: > > Move MASTER_SITES from CRITICAL to LOCAL/ehaupt > > Perhaps you should've considered doing it all in one go, and also I've done that in the past. I got complains that I shouldn't make large single commits but rather group them since it breaks sites like freshports. You just can't make it right for everyone. Someone will always complain. > explain what had happened to CRITICAL? These commit messages tell > nothing above that can't be figured from the diff itself... It MASTER_SITES_CRITICAL was a group of my own servers which I have to decommission very soon. I got permission from clusteradm@ to host the distfiles in LOCAL/ehaupt instead. I'm a bit surprised how much noise this series of commits created. Emanuel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150106184407.f0063f82e5ad6cc6f654338f>