From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Nov 28 13:22: 3 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from etinc.com (et-gw.etinc.com [207.252.1.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7291B37B400
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 13:22:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dbsys.etinc.com (dbsys.etinc.com [207.252.1.18])
	by etinc.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA87240
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 16:23:25 GMT
	(envelope-from dennis@etinc.com)
Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20001128160950.033784a0@mail.etinc.com>
X-Sender: dennis@mail.etinc.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 16:22:51 -0500
To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
From: Dennis <dennis@etinc.com>
Subject: tarball releases
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Wouldnt putting up a compressed tarball of the releases reduce bandwidth 
usage (and download time)?

I know I've asked this before, but it seems logical enough.

dennis



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message