From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 18 17:40:26 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834A416A46D for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 17:40:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QL=6abbd0bf@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5980E13C457 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 17:40:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QL=6abbd0bf@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB6F163F7B for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 12:17:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA4ED0501 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 12:17:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 17:17:36 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071118171736.6db678b6@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <200711181302.05161.peter.schuller@infidyne.com> References: <200711171116.06705.peter.schuller@infidyne.com> <20071117140337.513fb3e3@gumby.homeunix.com.> <200711181302.05161.peter.schuller@infidyne.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: sysutils/etcmerge vs mergemaster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 17:40:26 -0000 On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 13:01:56 +0100 Peter Schuller wrote: > > Isn't that what the -U option in mergemaster does? > > > > > > -U Attempt to auto upgrade files that have not been user > > modified. > > I believe I tried this once and it did not make a difference, but I > didn't investigate. Perhaps I screwed up. It's something I only noticed on the 6.2 upgrade, and I've never actually used. It seems to work by comparing hashes of installed files with the cvs versions from the previous run. I guess it doesn't work on the first upgrade as there's no stored database.