From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 9 01:28:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2192A16A400 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 01:28:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9F913C44C for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 01:28:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [88.64.185.1] (helo=amd64.laiers.local) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu7) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML2xA-1HaigB3NLq-0007YK; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 03:28:23 +0200 From: Max Laier Organization: FreeBSD To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org, KES Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 03:28:17 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <15810312978.20070409001552@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <15810312978.20070409001552@yandex.ru> X-Face: ,,8R(x[kmU]tKN@>gtH1yQE4aslGdu+2]; R]*pL,U>^H?)gW@49@wdJ`H<=?utf-8?q?=25=7D*=5FBD=0A=09U=5For=3D=5CmOZf764=26nYj=3DJYbR1PW0ud?=>|!~,,CPC.1-D$FG@0h3#'5"k{V]a~.<=?utf-8?q?mZ=7D44=23Se=7Em=0A=09Fe=7E=5C=5DX5B=5D=5Fxj?=(ykz9QKMw_l0C2AQ]}Ym8)fU MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1331892.aWnR98lHvb"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200704090328.22746.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/8wKC/meBci/7UKVUPLyTuwqPVR8S42jb5Vly y1DIE62Y3oPvtvkrVXeEc0tDGquQDXY8EEvVJ2deHXw+Vvjs50 FSuuH6fj6kWHbNDwZW0uw== Cc: Subject: Re: ipfw pf X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 01:28:27 -0000 --nextPart1331892.aWnR98lHvb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 08 April 2007 23:15, KES wrote: > What coming first: ipfw or pf? > -->rl0-->ipfw-->pf-->kernel-->pf--->ipfw > or > -->rl0-->pf-->ipfw-->kernel-->ipfw--->pf > ? Unfortunately you can't tell right now. It depends on when/how you enable= =20 the components. I did have some patches to allow for pfil reordering,=20 but they were interchanged with locking changes that were not such a good=20 idea. I intend to provide a mechanism to set the order via sysctl once=20 we have a final plan for pfil locking. Sorry. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart1331892.aWnR98lHvb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBGGZa2XyyEoT62BG0RAiOmAJsGsIn5vEJL5TxKdbp/UzTYt4UGugCeK0AO O7auX091nmn9x/J8Hk+wcm4= =E/0C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1331892.aWnR98lHvb--