From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Wed Dec 2 10:29:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913B7A3D56F; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:29:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 671C01FE3; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:29:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from [192.168.1.22] (253.Red-83-32-1.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.32.1.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8223843C0D; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 04:29:27 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: svn commit: r402813 - head/misc/astrolog To: Andrey Chernov , marino@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org References: <201512020629.tB26TbDb060296@repo.freebsd.org> <565E9DFA.6050502@marino.st> <565EAB52.6010301@freebsd.org> <565EAD1E.8080805@marino.st> <565EB1AC.4000508@freebsd.org> <565EB3B7.8030208@marino.st> <565EB894.4090402@freebsd.org> <565EBB1F.20208@marino.st> <565EBFA4.2010101@freebsd.org> <565EC203.2020204@marino.st> <565EC64D.2060701@freebsd.org> From: John Marino X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org Message-ID: <565EC804.1070406@marino.st> Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 11:29:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <565EC64D.2060701@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 10:29:30 -0000 On 12/2/2015 11:22 AM, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On 02.12.2015 13:03, John Marino wrote: > Well, I am not native English speaker, but even I know difference > between "can" I use in the commit message and "must" I don't use. In any > case it is such privilege to meet someone who better knows what I mean, > despite all my explanations. > Good luck, excellent mind reader. For native English speakers, these are weasel words. We know what you really meant and it doesn't take a mind reader. Your skill of English far exceeds being able to blame this on a language barrier. Summary: You make it clear that you think the previous commit should have made the extra step to fix the port. I made it clear that I think you shouldn't have have expectations like that and *DEFINITELY* should not have documented those thoughts on a commit message that lasts forever. If that last line wasn't on the commit message, none of this conversion ever would have happened, and if the unpleasantness means that it won't happen again, it was worth it.