From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Aug  7 16:23:56 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id QAA06707
          for questions-outgoing; Mon, 7 Aug 1995 16:23:56 -0700
Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (palmer.demon.co.uk [158.152.50.150])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA06699
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 7 Aug 1995 16:23:51 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	  by palmer.demon.co.uk (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id AAA04271
	  ; Tue, 8 Aug 1995 00:22:38 +0100
To: Manu_Iyengar@pscwa.psca.com
cc: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>, Gary Stanny <stanny@laa.com>,
        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, gary@laa.com
Subject: Re: tcpdump & bpf - Device not configured error 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 07 Aug 1995 16:09:47 PDT."
             <9508072309.AA03534@pscwa.psca.com> 
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 1995 00:22:37 +0100
Message-ID: <4269.807837757@palmer.demon.co.uk>
From: Gary Palmer <gary@palmer.demon.co.uk>
Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <9508072309.AA03534@pscwa.psca.com>, Manu Iyengar writes:
>Comments on this:

>1. Does it matter whether the pseudo-device line for the BPF  
>precedes or suceeds the device line for the ethernet interface in  
>the kernel config file?

Shouldn't do, no.

>2. I am unable to get the BPF to attach the interface to the Intel  
>EtherExpress 16 (ix0). /var/log/messages shows attachs for lo0, sl0  
>and tun0, but seems to skip ix0. Consequently, tcpdump complains  
>about ix0.

The ix driver doesn't have bpf support AFAIR.

Gary