Date: Wed, 04 Oct 1995 14:13:58 +0100 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: release coming soon Message-ID: <199510041313.OAA13769@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 03 Oct 1995 05:39:46 MST." <199510031239.FAA06266@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> P.S. The list of ports still using EXEC_DEPENDS.... ... > comms/hylafax/Makefile: ... Sorry I'm puzzled which implication to follow ? Are you : - implying by `still' that EXEC_DEPENDS is no longer used & we maintainers of listed ports should go read the FAQ html & do some upgrading ? or - implying people who upgrade other ports should watch they don't disturb ports listed as using EXEC_DEPENDS ? ? Julian S
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510041313.OAA13769>