From owner-freebsd-scsi Sat Jun 17 12: 3:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from relay01.chello.nl (smtp.chello.nl [212.83.68.144]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A27C37B7A1; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 12:03:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wkb@chello.nl) Received: from chello.nl ([213.46.78.184]) by relay01.chello.nl (InterMail vK.4.02.00.00 201-232-116 license 2ee4e7c625482f2f2a1950a80f6c8d58) with ESMTP id <20000617190423.XLVU10636.relay01@chello.nl>; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 21:04:23 +0200 Received: (from wkb@localhost) by chello.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA00305; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 21:03:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wkb) Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 21:03:32 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte To: Mike Smith Cc: Fanying Jen , freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Controller Timed on a Hard Disk Message-ID: <20000617210332.A239@freebie.wbnet> Reply-To: wc.bulte@chello.nl References: <200006171841.LAA00910@mass.osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <200006171841.LAA00910@mass.osd.bsdi.com>; from msmith@FreeBSD.ORG on Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 11:41:37AM -0700 X-OS: FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 11:41:37AM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: > > I finally got vinum to work, it turned out to be a bad hard disk. However, > > once I took the bad disk offline, another disk begins to acted up. Here is > > the diagram of the scsi chain. > > > > cindy.fynet.com fanying.fynet.com > > [T] [T] > > / \ > > [AHA 2940UW]=== ===[AHA 2940UW] > > \ / > > --[WDE9100 (0)]--[WDE9100 (1)]-- > > > > The disk that is now acting up is WDE9100(1) and it is giving the error > > message below. I am wondering why is FreeBSD keep on hiccuping whereas > > Linux doesn't complain at all? > > You don't say what you've set the IDs of the controllers to in this > diagram. As a general rule, though, I think that what you're trying to > do is probably not going to be possible (I see signs of "I can share this > array between two machines" thinking above). Assuming (e.g.) ID6 and 7 for the 2 Adaptecs it should work as far as SCSI goes. I don't like the use of SE SCSI for clustering-like setups but... If you have a RAID array that can present multiple LUNs / storagesets you can give each machine it's own storage to bang onto. You are of course right in saying that just hooking up 2 machines to the same disk is a no-no (maybe you can get away with giving each machine it's own part[ition] of the disk -- Wilko Bulte http://www.freebsd.org "Do, or do not. There is no try" wilko@freebsd.org http://www.nlfug.nl - Yoda - The Empire Strikes Back To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message