From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 27 10:36:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC32C16A4CE for ; Thu, 27 May 2004 10:36:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from huva.hittite.isp.9tel.net (huva.hittite.isp.9tel.net [62.62.156.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6952643D49 for ; Thu, 27 May 2004 10:36:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from clefevre-lists@9online.fr) Received: from pc2k (33.230.62.62.9nanterr1-0-ro-bas-1.9tel.net [62.62.230.33]) by huva.hittite.isp.9tel.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E8BC9C17B; Thu, 27 May 2004 19:36:47 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <00e301c44410$f7dce170$7890a8c0@dyndns.org> From: "Cyrille Lefevre" To: , References: <200405262234.i4QMYFwP027591@cinnamon.com><40B52EDD.3080306@reversedhell.net> <20040527044538.GF5009@zot.electricrain.com> Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 19:35:11 +0200 Organization: ACME MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Subject: Re: simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 17:36:09 -0000 "Chris Doherty" wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 02:57:17AM +0300, Anton Alin-Adrian said: > > Andrew Beals wrote: > > >Why is there no default pop3 implementation included in the FreeBSD > > >distribution? Is it for a lack of a suitably-licensed server, or does > > >everyone believe APOP authentication is crackable? > > > > Is there any for IMAP? > > cd /usr/ports/mail ; make search key=imap > > or > > http://www.freebsd.org/ports/mail.html if you're using standard mbox format, dovecot is your freind and is faster than imap-uw since they are indexes. it also known about courier's maildir format and is really simple to configure. http://monkey.org/openbsd/archive/misc/0405/msg00490.html if you're using maildir mbox format, consider courier-imap or binc-imap. if you're using virtual domains, courier-imap would be your friend. Cyrille Lefevre. -- home: mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net