Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 19:35:11 +0200 From: "Cyrille Lefevre" <clefevre-lists@9online.fr> To: <chris-freebsd@randomcamel.net>, <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: simple, nay, elegant pop3 implementation? Message-ID: <00e301c44410$f7dce170$7890a8c0@dyndns.org> References: <200405262234.i4QMYFwP027591@cinnamon.com><40B52EDD.3080306@reversedhell.net> <20040527044538.GF5009@zot.electricrain.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Chris Doherty" <chris-freebsd@randomcamel.net> wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 02:57:17AM +0300, Anton Alin-Adrian said: > > Andrew Beals wrote: > > >Why is there no default pop3 implementation included in the FreeBSD > > >distribution? Is it for a lack of a suitably-licensed server, or does > > >everyone believe APOP authentication is crackable? > > > > Is there any for IMAP? > > cd /usr/ports/mail ; make search key=imap > > or > > http://www.freebsd.org/ports/mail.html if you're using standard mbox format, dovecot is your freind and is faster than imap-uw since they are indexes. it also known about courier's maildir format and is really simple to configure. http://monkey.org/openbsd/archive/misc/0405/msg00490.html if you're using maildir mbox format, consider courier-imap or binc-imap. if you're using virtual domains, courier-imap would be your friend. Cyrille Lefevre. -- home: mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00e301c44410$f7dce170$7890a8c0>