From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Oct 12 21:13:26 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA13497 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 21:13:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA13488 for ; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 21:13:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA01497; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 21:13:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199710130413.VAA01497@rah.star-gate.com> To: Simon Shapiro cc: Douglas Carmichael , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: C2 Trusted FreeBSD? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 12 Oct 1997 19:20:48 PDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 12 Oct 1997 21:13:01 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The problem is solvable and I work on trusted systems (B1) every day. Almost said I work in trusted system (sight...) So to the original question : the answer is yes and it is not a quick hack affair. Amancio >From The Desk Of Simon Shapiro : > > Hi Douglas Carmichael; On 13-Oct-97 you wrote: > > Could FreeBSD be made to comply with B1 or C2 trusted system standards > > FOR REAL (unlike NT that can only comply when not hooked up to a > > network)? > > Last I checked (looooong time ago), Unix had the same problem. TCP/IP was, > at the time, inhenerntly un-Orangable. > > BTW, How did the problem of cut and paste between windows get solved? > > --- > > > Sincerely Yours, > > Simon Shapiro Atlas Telecom > Senior Architect 14355 SW Allen Blvd., Suite 130 Beaverton OR 97005 > Shimon@i-Connect.Net Voice: 503.799.2313 >