From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec  7 20:10:21 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA4B1065726
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed,  7 Dec 2011 20:10:21 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mwm@mired.org)
Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.210.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4718FC18
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed,  7 Dec 2011 20:10:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iafi7 with SMTP id i7so2291709iaf.13
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 12:10:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.231.41.69 with SMTP id n5mr4823973ibe.92.1323287280368;
	Wed, 07 Dec 2011 11:48:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mikmeyer-vm-fedora (dhcp-173-37-11-193.cisco.com.
	[173.37.11.193])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cz1sm10030864ibb.11.2011.12.07.11.47.59
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 07 Dec 2011 11:47:59 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 11:47:56 -0800
From: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20111207114756.48295690@mikmeyer-vm-fedora>
In-Reply-To: <CAFHbX1+RmnzA-0W2KxAC8L=n3EEtnXp7ytsgt2ZMENMmG7gvEw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4EDEB600.9000102@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
	<CAFHbX1KT6AoPPWY6+bYbqyVy6CXTfZsMUwjLRfKBMdOSDoXw9A@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EDF4703.1050705@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
	<CAFHbX1JuZPgsKCwVO5eRPm6jPk29tSANbGj82gz2eVDP1=abcQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4EDF5253.5060201@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
	<CAFHbX1+RmnzA-0W2KxAC8L=n3EEtnXp7ytsgt2ZMENMmG7gvEw@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Meyer Consulting
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.7; i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: 64bit build errors
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 20:10:21 -0000

On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 12:17:57 +0000
Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> wrote:
> The way I understand it is that they use compiler/assembler features
> that did not exist in the version of binutils that is in base.

Which begs the question - why isn't the new version of the tools
(provided by ports) listed in BUILDDEPENDS in the port, then?

      <mike