Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 11:47:56 -0800 From: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64bit build errors Message-ID: <20111207114756.48295690@mikmeyer-vm-fedora> In-Reply-To: <CAFHbX1%2BRmnzA-0W2KxAC8L=n3EEtnXp7ytsgt2ZMENMmG7gvEw@mail.gmail.com> References: <4EDEB600.9000102@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <CAFHbX1KT6AoPPWY6%2BbYbqyVy6CXTfZsMUwjLRfKBMdOSDoXw9A@mail.gmail.com> <4EDF4703.1050705@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <CAFHbX1JuZPgsKCwVO5eRPm6jPk29tSANbGj82gz2eVDP1=abcQ@mail.gmail.com> <4EDF5253.5060201@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <CAFHbX1%2BRmnzA-0W2KxAC8L=n3EEtnXp7ytsgt2ZMENMmG7gvEw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 12:17:57 +0000
Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> wrote:
> The way I understand it is that they use compiler/assembler features
> that did not exist in the version of binutils that is in base.
Which begs the question - why isn't the new version of the tools
(provided by ports) listed in BUILDDEPENDS in the port, then?
<mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111207114756.48295690>