From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Mar 24 00:38:20 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA06439 for chat-outgoing; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 00:38:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from kremvax.demos.su (kremvax.demos.su [194.87.0.20]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA06429 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 00:38:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by kremvax.demos.su (8.6.13/D) from 0@sinbin.demos.su [194.87.0.31] with ESMTP id LAA06356; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 11:35:33 +0300 Received: by sinbin.demos.su id LAA26862; (8.6.12/D) Mon, 24 Mar 1997 11:35:11 +0300 Message-Id: <199703240835.LAA26862@sinbin.demos.su> Subject: Re: 2.2.1 - rumours? To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Mon, 24 Mar 1997 11:35:11 +0300 (MSK) Cc: chat@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <19970324084146.LX49212@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Mar 24, 97 08:41:46 am From: "Mikhail A. Sokolov" X-Class: Fast Organization: Demos Company, Ltd. Reply-To: mishania@demos.su X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME7a] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > As Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > Something like it can include these if_fxp/aic* patches et cetra? > > Yes. Stay tuned, as we say. > Oh, did i hear somebody volunteering for `aic' here? :-) > Ah, no, it's just `ahc' that's being talked about... Too bad. Don't recall exact versions of the aic*.c, which has kindly been hacked to working state by David Greeman after 2.2-R, but I can assure 3940{w,uw,common} work now. Same with Intel Etherexpress 100/b tx4 rev. 1, - works in full duplex. No offence, but well, I am kinda frightend by the stream of version per one week, like we have now, - 2.1.7/2.2-R/2.2-970317-GAMMA\/not-gamma/2.1.7.1... > cheers, J"org -mishania