From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb 19 01:50:45 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D13DE25
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 01:50:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com
 [209.85.217.182])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB8943C5
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 01:50:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lbdu14 with SMTP id u14so4890202lbd.1
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:50:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=3N8BcpUGzklDfXOznZyk3FbqEavG3xn6Hr7FNZxBTcw=;
 b=GvZjlcGczWy07BjkmbBJcS+wovQAQxZ0ckLDKCObQ+qOTLq3oT9PjUtXkSkVPEyfAv
 95xuO4xLNGoJZ6Y5+Arqlb/o2S9wpiTqLPTYV+bxziaClC2wgaqYsQiaSTea8h2vsort
 q0INMdBElyE/z5bj+oCWNk2aVNsvfwVZ8uBU0CyV0/UDfKkVYLdggwEuM2uUzykuCvFQ
 0ziXttx715HkDQuW7wTEc4z83k82qh+ObZHb8r5e68D6n9mnszWveqUUo9sTq0sWROy0
 ix13KruD2fd8A1W+KGlE1qvp6m/g4pkzJs4NXpbOnMUtFPCcbEfhNo3o/FKcplkz4hCv
 wOmg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.65.196 with SMTP id z4mr2013835lbs.28.1424310642201;
 Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:50:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.90.131 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:50:42 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:50:42 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKOb=YZEe05JLa3SwAdFsttWW1u8LfzYRF_zOG5_heCTnyoseA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: squid 3.5 plans
From: Nick Rogers <ncrogers@gmail.com>
To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 01:50:45 -0000

It seems that squid 3.5 is becoming the latest recommended production
quality version. Squid 3.4.12 and 3.5.2 were just released today. What is
everyones thought (or the maintainers plan) on moving the www/squid port
from 3.4 to 3.5?

It looks like the www/squid33 port has been kept around past its ideal
expiration date because of an issue with ntlm_auth affecting squid 3.4.
This bug has been fixed in the latest 3.4 and 3.5 release.
http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3997

So is the idea to now move the www/squid port to 3.5, or create yet another
squid port of www/squid35 because we want to keep 3.4 as the "stable"
version for a while. I am just wondering because I would like to move my
production environment from squid 3.4 to 3.5, and am happy to contribute
patches to the ports tree, but am not sure what the plans are.

Thanks.

-Nick