From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 14:22:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A94216A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:22:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.allcaps.org (mail.allcaps.org [206.251.247.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C39643D54 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:22:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsder@allcaps.org) Received: from mail.allcaps.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.allcaps.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59699D844C; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:29:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (bsder@localhost)i0TMTjML021771; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:29:46 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.allcaps.org: bsder owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:29:45 -0800 (PST) From: "Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr." To: Frode Nordahl In-Reply-To: <68FC202A-525D-11D8-B122-000A95A9A574@nordahl.net> Message-ID: <20040129135653.H21660@mail.allcaps.org> References: <3DC16400-517B-11D8-9CB2-0005028F6AEB@TrueStep.com> <68FC202A-525D-11D8-B122-000A95A9A574@nordahl.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 05:30:02 -0800 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rpc.lockd(8) seg faults on 5.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 22:22:42 -0000 On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Frode Nordahl wrote: > Caught a new and different core dump from rpc.lockd today. > > (gdb) bt > #0 dump_filelock (fl=0x809c000) at lockd_lock.c:318 > #1 0x0804e0a1 in lock_nfslock (fl=0x8080815) at lockd_lock.c:875 Your line numbering seems off. You might want to provide a little more context of what line actually failed. ie. line 875 indicates a test_nfslock() call and 318 is an initial function bracket Nonetheless, the reasons for your core dumps elude me. In both cases, the fl should have caused a core dump *before* the line you are indicating. -a