From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org  Tue Oct  6 16:45:40 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D6D39D0104
 for <freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue,  6 Oct 2015 16:45:40 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de)
Received: from raven.bwct.de (raven.bwct.de [85.159.14.73])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "raven.bwct.de", Issuer "BWCT" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36CE8F73
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Tue,  6 Oct 2015 16:45:39 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de)
Received: from mail.cicely.de ([10.1.1.37])
 by raven.bwct.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id t96Gjb03041147
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL);
 Tue, 6 Oct 2015 18:45:37 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de)
Received: from cicely7.cicely.de (cicely7.cicely.de [10.1.1.9])
 by mail.cicely.de (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t96GjVE1049917
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
 Tue, 6 Oct 2015 18:45:31 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de)
Received: from cicely7.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by cicely7.cicely.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id t96GjVZn089579;
 Tue, 6 Oct 2015 18:45:31 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de)
Received: (from ticso@localhost)
 by cicely7.cicely.de (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id t96GjVlP089578;
 Tue, 6 Oct 2015 18:45:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso)
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 18:45:31 +0200
From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de>
To: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com>
Cc: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: build kernel on RPI2 errors
Message-ID: <20151006164531.GB89482@cicely7.cicely.de>
Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de
References: <5611F005.60201@kronometrix.org>
 <10CB4F8C-3F30-45EE-921F-C6E3981EC01F@kientzle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <10CB4F8C-3F30-45EE-921F-C6E3981EC01F@kientzle.com>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely7.cicely.de 7.0-STABLE i386
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9,
 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on spamd.cicely.de
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 16:45:40 -0000

On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 05:58:40AM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> 
> > On Oct 4, 2015, at 8:35 PM, Stefan Parvu <sparvu@kronometrix.org> wrote:
> > 
> > cc: error: unable to execute command: Killed
> > cc: error: clang frontend command failed due to signal (use -v to see
> > invocation)
> 
> I wonder if this error message could be any better?
> It's such a common issue on these small-memory systems.
> 
> Is it possible for 'cc' to detect whether clang died
> due to an out-of-memory condition and print out
> a slightly more detailed message in that case?

The kernel message is quite clear.
Wonder why it became so uncommon over the last years to check dmesg.

-- 
B.Walter <bernd@bwct.de> http://www.bwct.de
Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.