From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 18:25:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3913A7F; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:25:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp5.ore.mailhop.org (smtp5.ore.mailhop.org [54.186.10.118]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F31FFAD; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:25:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [73.34.117.227] (helo=ilsoft.org) by smtp5.ore.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1YELw6-000642-9q; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:52:54 +0000 Received: from revolution.hippie.lan (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240]) by ilsoft.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0MHqreH004648; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:52:53 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) X-Mail-Handler: DuoCircle Outbound SMTP X-Originating-IP: 73.34.117.227 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@duocircle.com (see https://support.duocircle.com/support/solutions/articles/5000540958-duocircle-standard-smtp-abuse-information for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+fH9D4QV3nEVGAaF+jXm28 Message-ID: <1421949173.14601.405.camel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: interrupt framework From: Ian Lepore To: Svatopluk Kraus Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:52:53 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <54BA9888.1020303@freebsd.org> <54BD3F86.3010901@freebsd.org> <54BD9794.4080204@freebsd.org> <54BE7E6D.6060800@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.8 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:25:51 -0000 On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 17:59 +0100, Svatopluk Kraus wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Nathan Whitehorn > wrote: > > > > On 01/20/15 03:19, Svatopluk Kraus wrote: [...] > > Today, I made intrng more complete. I implemented fully the interrupt > naming and counting (IPI included). However, it will not work well in > case of removable PICs now. I'm attaching new version. > > Svata The existance of removable PICs is theoretical. Well, I know of i2c chips that exist that would be removable PICs, but our support for them is still theoretical. I don' think we have to worry about supporting them in the near future, we just have to keep in mind that the possibility exists some day. -- Ian