From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 29 14:18:08 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 321C816A401
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:18:08 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com)
Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F52143D45
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:18:07 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com)
Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan [127.0.0.1])
	by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k2TEHx4n084104
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:17:59 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
	by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k2TEHwbg084103;
	Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:17:58 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com)
From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com>
To: Glenn Dawson <glenn@antimatter.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:17:58 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
References: <200603281422.57389.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>
	<200603290026.36453@aldan>
	<7.0.1.0.2.20060328213006.0764dd48@antimatter.net>
In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060328213006.0764dd48@antimatter.net>
X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7w<gv/&E-lL7twZCT8B~/PA4|\t$ti+22K">hJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli"<kcG^EOVihy+z3/UR{6SCQ
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200603290917.58586@aldan>
Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Derek Ragona <derek@computinginnovations.com>
Subject: Re: virtusertable blocking seems to have no effect
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:18:08 -0000

On Wednesday 29 March 2006 12:35 am, Glenn Dawson wrote:
= I saw that, but you had that part right...I thought the only
= problem was with getting the reject message to work properly.
= 
= Anyway...
= 
= This is what I typically do:
= 
= foo@bar.com           localaccount1
= bar@bar.com           localaccount2
= @bar.com              error:nouser 550 No such user here

Glenn, this is exactly what I have according to my initial posting
in this thread. I took the example from sendmail's cf/README:

= Here is (almost) what I have in the virtusertable:
= 
=       stol@example.com  foo
=       hq@example.com    bar
=       @example.com      error:5.7.0:550 No spam, thanks

Unfortunately, as I write in that initial posting, although it does have
some effect, it does not seem sufficient:

= I can see the "No spam,thanks" messages logged in the maillog 
= (without the space after coma, for some reason), but there is 
= no reject=550 message logged (which interferes with my other 
= software) and some of these messages seem to pass through 
= (although others are intercepted by other anti-spam defenses).
= 
= For example, here are the only two log entries, that a spam 
= message generates:
= 
= Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: <xgfytxswpcpc@blackalpinist.com>... No spam,thanks
= Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: from=<example@example.net>, size=3305, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=example.example.net [xx.x.xx.xxx]
= 
= Despite the "No spam,thanks" the message was accepted.
= 
= What am I doing wrong? Thanks!

Yours,

	-mi