From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Oct 21 18:00:06 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA23328 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 18:00:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports) Received: from coconut.itojun.org (root@coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA23266; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 18:00:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from itojun@itojun.org) From: itojun@itojun.org Received: from localhost (itojun@localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (8.8.5/3.6Wbeta6) with ESMTP id JAA13473; Wed, 22 Oct 1997 09:59:44 +0900 (JST) To: Bill Fenner cc: fenner@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: fenner's message of Tue, 21 Oct 1997 17:36:51 PDT. <97Oct21.173657pdt.177487@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2 Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports: 1 unfetchable distfiles: sysutils/mei Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 09:59:44 +0900 Message-ID: <13470.877481984@coconut.itojun.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Yuck. I explicitly flag HTTP redirections as being unfetchable, under >the assumption that the only reason for an HTTP redirect is to point >to the new canonical location, and the old canonical location will be >going away soon. Alright, I'll change the port to make it use "spock.vector.co.jp". itojun