From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Feb 28 15:48:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55290AB6B52 for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 15:48:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsduser@cloudzeeland.nl) Received: from ceto.cloudzeeland.nl (cloudzeeland.xs4all.nl [83.161.133.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cloudzeeland.nl", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A3B28EC for ; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 15:48:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsduser@cloudzeeland.nl) Received: from ceto.cloudzeeland.nl (ceto.cloudzeeland.nl [10.10.10.30]) by ceto.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD44547CAFC2; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 16:48:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.10.10.33] (unknown [82.176.127.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ceto.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1C1E47CAFBF; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 16:48:39 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Hosts To: Steve O'Hara-Smith , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <56D2C3E0.8030406@cloudzeeland.nl> <20160228101701.9697655568ffdad305ba9328@sohara.org> From: JosC Message-ID: <56D316D8.3040600@cloudzeeland.nl> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 16:48:40 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160228101701.9697655568ffdad305ba9328@sohara.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on ceto.cloudzeeland.nl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 15:48:50 -0000 In een bericht van 28-2-2016 11:17: > No because domain names are global in scope while MAC addresses are > local. Mac addresses are unique (you can fake/clone them but that is another topic discussion) - imho they therefore can be used globally as well? But saying that, it is in my case not a problem to use them locally as the issue concerns my local network. > You can set up DHCP to issue fixed addresses based on MAC. I do use DHCP and fixed combined. Using this I am familiar with; my issue is identifying hardware in a network that is partitially using DHCP. Thanks, Jos Chrispijn