Date: Sun, 31 Oct 1999 23:52:08 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: eischen@vigrid.com, nate@mt.sri.com Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, julian@whistle.com Subject: Re: Threads goals version II Message-ID: <199911010452.XAA27063@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Multiple processes/LWPs should be allowed to have their own quantum and > > not count towards the [parent] process quantum, right? > > As I read that, no. A multi-threaded process shouldn't be given any > more 'resources' than a single-threaded process. I differentiate between a thread created with PTHREAD_SCOPE_SYSTEM and PTHREAD_SCOPE_PROCESS. A thread with scope system contends for resources with all other threads in the same scheduling allocation domain relative to their system scheduling attributes...[POSIX standard]. I'd like to map PTHREAD_SCOPE_SYSTEM to the equivalent of an rfork. Dan Eishen eischen@vigrid.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199911010452.XAA27063>