Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 Mar 2018 16:57:53 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 226850] [pf] Matching but failed rules block without return
Message-ID:  <bug-226850-17777-ZwIPNz4UMY@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-226850-17777@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-226850-17777@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D226850

--- Comment #11 from Ermal Lu=C3=A7i <eri@freebsd.org> ---
I misread the issue you are experiencing.
I do not see any impact on this apart of either=20
- overloading the set block-policy global to express the global policy. pf
already marks as dropped the packets that go through failure paths.
- Introduce a new global policy like set failure-return-policy.=20

In both scenarios the underlying implementation does not differ.
I am not sure on the added value of having it be controllable per-rule!

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-226850-17777-ZwIPNz4UMY>