From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 22 19:09:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A7737B401 for ; Sun, 22 Jun 2003 19:09:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B3143F85 for ; Sun, 22 Jun 2003 19:09:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from slumos@unlv.edu) Received: from user181.net113.lv.sprint-hsd.net ([208.13.131.181] helo=post-office.nevada.edu) by snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19UGm5-0003VW-00 for freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org; Sun, 22 Jun 2003 19:09:41 -0700 From: slumos@unlv.edu To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 19:09:41 -0700 Message-Id: Subject: something preventing vlc update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 02:09:43 -0000 I'm looking into vlc and noticed that a) the port is using a pretty (at least 9 months) old version, in spite of b) that multiple patches have already been sent in to update it (at least one in April and one in May). Is there something preventing it from being updated that the people who sent patches missed? Steve