Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:09:42 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] Please convert your ports to new options framework Message-ID: <20120608140942.GB15841@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20120603184448.GI92976@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20120603184448.GI92976@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 08:44:48PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > already have notice bsd.options.desc.mk provide shared descriptions of the usual > options, try to be consistent and reuse the same options name so that it is > simpler for users, please override the description for your ports each time it > make sense, remember that most of the time a functional description is more OPTIONS= PROFILE "Build a profiling library" Off This seems to be a common option (many math/ ports use it), yet it's not in bsd.options.desc.mk. Should it be added to it? Or shall I define it for my port (math/slatec)? -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120608140942.GB15841>