Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:09:42 +0100
From:      Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk>
To:        Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [HEADSUP] Please convert your ports to new options framework
Message-ID:  <20120608140942.GB15841@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20120603184448.GI92976@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
References:  <20120603184448.GI92976@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 08:44:48PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> 
> already have notice bsd.options.desc.mk provide shared descriptions of the usual
> options, try to be consistent and reuse the same options name so that it is
> simpler for users, please override the description for your ports each time it
> make sense, remember that most of the time a functional description is more

OPTIONS=        PROFILE "Build a profiling library" Off

This seems to be a common option (many math/ ports use it),
yet it's not in bsd.options.desc.mk. Should it be added to it?
Or shall I define it for my port (math/slatec)?

-- 
Anton Shterenlikht
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
Bristol University
University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944
Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120608140942.GB15841>