From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 10:20:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A8216A4B3 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 10:20:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.caraldi.com (caraldi.com [62.212.102.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572F543FE9 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 10:20:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jbq@caraldi.com) Received: from watt.intra.caraldi.com (watt.intra.caraldi.com [192.168.100.101]) by mail.caraldi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BABC2177 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:20:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: by watt.intra.caraldi.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9C3A92B; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:20:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:20:45 +0200 From: Jean-Baptiste Quenot To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030929172043.GA54396@watt.intra.caraldi.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20030909152452.GC10815@watt.intra.caraldi.com> <1063121517.50301.24.camel@jake> <20030929104642.GA8813@watt.intra.caraldi.com> <20030929130756.59cfb046.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030929130756.59cfb046.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Re: New port: NumlockX X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:20:21 -0000 * Adam McLaurin: > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:46:44 +0200 Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote: > > > I'm wondering why it always takes *ages* to change the ports tree. > > Either the committers are not interested, or they don't have spare > > time to handle such requests. > > According to the audit trail on ports/56638 , Ernst found many > problems with the port when running it through portlint. Ernst picked this PR today, and I thank him for having done so. > Have you addressed these issues? Perhaps he needs to run it through > again. I adressed these issues immediately, the updated port is available. -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot http://caraldi.com/jbq/