From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 20 18:45:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B4DD2FB for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 18:45:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sean_bruno@yahoo.com) Received: from nm19-vm8.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm19-vm8.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.136.217.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E230D29FD for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 18:45:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [216.39.60.182] by nm19.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Sep 2013 18:43:57 -0000 Received: from [208.71.42.194] by tm18.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Sep 2013 18:43:57 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp205.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Sep 2013 18:43:57 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1379702637; bh=sE2hMAzanEtxXptuml9kt8dPyjmTUiswV3oEfvv32O4=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Subject:From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-ID:Mime-Version:X-Mailer; b=aYqEu0Ddxn4bza9tukk/c4Gtq4oP9F4P2e0wPinkDm8nQ9/xiHtlXRqVMxL7IhwKjRjiLGkG+nWz75XGX+X4j5u+tuRE0BB3Bs29Zz+pJ3uSLzs3wlhK3G8Fx2uT7aMElnjezPkBZdFOciS2M9lmquRTWvWkZ2LaFcvcX9NKKuA= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 803992.84319.bm@smtp205.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: ui.Oh3wVM1lyopqwk_1bJxW7Lten6x47Wsja_mvEgX77l9f fhQUr8Kq2WNKlGaYBHCZIpIo4MHXB.TnpkgMFNrERU5LpSQNc4pQo7StiGUl NCEtOUvXMPQn79Jp51wrNwzktM8lkpJqT5VncB2nAzv9QL1rjX_WQ9UDGdKb qk5Sn7Is39m1bRxRyhXNEoUHuMeRk1c_seCt_htkXqVqGxFy9JgkiMkDq_um _OkG6eI_0wRaajiuh7w2ZfSsL3PFLnyJqEAdYBRujDvf5p1HLpPDBuO6kqji PLGyFCoutGIo283ucfwBedB_oFEzG9Jk2IuckLe9Juz9FUlFrr5vpPUj5nQK toLxbYdXdtAFi_V7CTLqdchC6bA6xX02yFOmB3CV0q345.MgF4Glgej5Pv2M l69_fnCRUOLI_hfYxt4eDgrKq47YWbJ4_VSsDfhLZrq_zJZ9LyaDVZQ57z4N _rv1mIOEGG7o18XsbwpN2N1OZcBxpB1ChloWhKlgXIzl2QRoe1Z20UY2328G 295Gc5ybKaWXL_sz7GhsV6GyRebsd0.M2qdMbnvvQ3RRurae0NXRoGsNWwfz SVfJtAzzBsY5njqB5Ddy8TNfPK66ST6O8ZVzAaUnXEbn__spLIEnAKVkyGKQ TYE6joox2k.IhpG1K46AKQnGgry.PzgoAhTmsrA-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: u5BKR6OswBC_iZJVfGRoMkTIpc8pEA4- X-Rocket-Received: from [10.73.160.242] (sean_bruno@209.131.62.116 with ) by smtp205.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Sep 2013 11:43:57 -0700 PDT Subject: Re: zfs mount prior to rc.conf evaluations From: Sean Bruno To: freebsd-fs In-Reply-To: <1376953030.1483.4.camel@localhost> References: <1376953030.1483.4.camel@localhost> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-fT0vFczws7qtjPi1GZGN" Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:43:57 -0700 Message-ID: <1379702637.2402.4.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: sbruno@freebsd.org List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 18:45:42 -0000 --=-fT0vFczws7qtjPi1GZGN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 15:57 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > We have a few slightly goofy rc.conf variables that require /usr/bin/ to > be mounted before rc.conf is evaluated, e.g: >=20 > netwait_ip=3D"$(grep default /etc/start_if.* | awk '{print $4}')" >=20 > This worked in our UFS world, but in ZFS land with zroot/usr/bin being a > seperate mountpoint, its not mounted at the point that rc.conf is > evaluated causing a few things to fail. >=20 > This appears to be solved by applying > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D153666 >=20 > But, is there a better way to do this? I *could* make zroot/usr and > zroot/usr/bin just be part of zroot and not seperate mountpoints to > solve the issue as well. >=20 > Thoughts or alternative solutions? >=20 > Sean anyone? If there's no real objection, I don't see the harm in committing this. Sean --=-fT0vFczws7qtjPi1GZGN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJSPJdtAAoJEBkJRdwI6BaH+o0H/0vgSTyEqV+CubUd9t9YhEQs FmcYlTTVOO25KNOCjb+NOaXYwFO7pvOys90IfDARg+tmvUhTJgY7PfXpkOaNP7As rNG3syexSvlHAZdUdWi/6+AfhE33OuBQgFI11ylBS2gVefFuYiWF8t/p4z8XyZxE RkF0XfE9hqW0xFXlRYh1X6biRtN+3oT1cd9OU9qcACWJ3xJ51vcjHMK4skJdzPPk /8UAZGtXD30MtAnOABWKUgqmm4HZI2mJHmVxthfwvSd773+J7dKa7pv+QCWZ/583 ZPu23Q6ODuWR6g/m3gZPFhUq1czai78tDp0OPZwH53Tpzjn30wLCeB3p4vWswd8= =lu7q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-fT0vFczws7qtjPi1GZGN--