Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 20:47:25 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Cc: mark@grondar.za (Mark Murray), FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.Org (FreeBSD current) Subject: Re: DES, crypt and eBones Message-ID: <199506161847.UAA14596@grumble.grondar.za>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I disagree. eBones was to and does replace the 4.4BSD lite supplied > Kerberos tree. I can use ``secure'' without eBones at all. If you > bundle the two into one tree it is going to complicate things like > sup targets, source tree management in src/Makefile, etc. OK - I'll buy this. How would you then solve the problem of something currently sitting in secure that needs bits of eBones and vice versa? For example, in secure sits telnet[d] with obvious Kerberization. > Binary sets should match source sets, otherwise you are heading for > trouble :-(. I'd buy this if there was not so much crosstalk between the packages. Solutions? One possible one is to move libraries to secure? (yuk) M -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506161847.UAA14596>