From owner-freebsd-security Fri Jan 7 8:39:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (news-ma.rhein-neckar.de [193.197.90.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E15157E2 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 08:39:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from daemon@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de) Received: from bigeye.rhein-neckar.de (uucp@localhost) by news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with bsmtp id RAA08053 for freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 17:39:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from daemon@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by bigeye.rhein-neckar.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA49654 for freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Fri, 7 Jan 2000 16:04:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from daemon) From: naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de (Christian Weisgerber) Subject: dump over ssh Date: 7 Jan 2000 16:04:26 +0100 Message-ID: <854v9q$1gf9$1@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org So far I have received *zero* reactions to my proposal in PR #15830. I suggest to add to dump/restore the capability to access remote tapes over arbitrary rsh(1)-like commands, which would in particular allow to run dump over ssh, say # dump -0aP ssh -f host:/dev/nrsa0 / (The PR includes a proof of concept patch to implement this.) No interest? -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message