From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Apr 3 11:15:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from 0lsen.net (12-224-41-96.client.attbi.com [12.224.41.96]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBC637B41C for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 11:15:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 0lsen.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CDB39C54; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 11:15:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 11:15:50 -0800 From: Clint Olsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Ports collection & CVSup vs. /stand/sysinstall Message-ID: <20020403191550.GA20621@0lsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Organization: NULlsen Network X-Disclaimer: Mutt Bites! Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ok, I need a cluepon. The web site doesn't really distinguish "what you get" between these two types of updating. 1) Using /stand/sysinstall, download the ports collection as described in the online docs. 2) Using the instructions described on the web page, update my ports-supfile and run CVSup. Should either #1 or #2 produce the same results? Or does #1 only grab what was "released" as of the 4.5-RELEASE? The reason why I ask is that CVSup appeared to have made changes to my ports collection. Thanks, -Clint To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message