From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 7 16:31:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9B016A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:31:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.31.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2565A43D39 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:31:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cernm0bm@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz) Received: by artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 10663) id ED9A84A57; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 18:31:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 18:31:33 +0200 From: Marian Cerny To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040907163133.GA24426@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 11:41:53 +0000 Subject: LOR (re0 and ACPI root bus) in BETA3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 16:31:35 -0000 I have this LOR every time I boot: lock order reversal 1st 0xc177b6e8 re0 (network driver) @ /usr/src/sys/dev/re/if_re.c:830 2nd 0xc0a18000 ACPI root bus (ACPI root bus) @ /usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../dev/acpica/acpi.c:913 KDB: stack backtrace: kdb_backtrace(0,ffffffff,c08bde68,c08be3b8,c084ddac) at kdb_backtrace+0x29 witness_checkorder(c0a18000,9,c0a126c9,391) at witness_checkorder+0x544 _sx_xlock(c0a18000,c0a126c9,391,0,1) at _sx_xlock+0x50 acpi_release_resource(c178aa00,c17bd100,4,10,c17b0b00) at acpi_release_resource+0x26 bus_generic_release_resource(c16bfc00,c17bd100,4,10,c17b0b00) at bus_generic_release_resource+0x64 resource_list_release(c17bd184,c17a9680,c17bd100,4,10) at resource_list_release+0xfb bus_generic_rl_release_resource(c17a9680,c17bd100,4,10,c17b0b00) at bus_generic_rl_release_resource+0x5e bus_release_resource(c17bd100,4,10,c17b0b00,c17bd100) at bus_release_resource+0x61 re_probe(c17bd100) at re_probe+0x1b5 device_probe_child(c17a9680,c17bd100,c17bd300,c17bd100,c17a9680) at device_probe_child+0xc4 device_probe_and_attach(c17bd100) at device_probe_and_attach+0x51 bus_generic_attach(c17a9680,6,c1699700,1,c0a00f2c) at bus_generic_attach+0x16 acpi_pci_attach(c17a9680) at acpi_pci_attach+0xec device_attach(c17a9680,2e696370,c17a9680,c16bfc00,0) at device_attach+0x58 device_probe_and_attach(c17a9680) at device_probe_and_attach+0xb4 bus_generic_attach(c16bfc00,c16bfc00,c17a0b94,0,0) at bus_generic_attach+0x16 acpi_pcib_attach(c16bfc00,c17a0b94,0,c0c21c58,c0616c00) at acpi_pcib_attach+0x14e acpi_pcib_acpi_attach(c16bfc00) at acpi_pcib_acpi_attach+0x20a device_attach(c16bfc00,c0a175c8,c16bfc00,c178aa00,0) at device_attach+0x58 device_probe_and_attach(c16bfc00) at device_probe_and_attach+0xb4 bus_generic_attach(c178aa00,c178aa00,c178aa00,c1699ac0,3) at bus_generic_attach+0x16 acpi_probe_children(c178aa00,303b630,c178aa00,c178aa00,0) at acpi_probe_children+0x69 acpi_attach(c178aa00) at acpi_attach+0x523 device_attach(c178aa00,c0a16620,c178aa00,c178ab80,0) at device_attach+0x58 device_probe_and_attach(c178aa00) at device_probe_and_attach+0xb4 bus_generic_attach(c178ab80,c178ab80,c178ab80,c0c21d44,c0612fe8) at bus_generic_attach+0x16 nexus_attach(c178ab80) at nexus_attach+0x13 device_attach(c178ab80,c0886130,c178ab80,c0886130,c29000) at device_attach+0x58 device_probe_and_attach(c178ab80) at device_probe_and_attach+0xb4 root_bus_configure(c16aec00,c080f18a,0) at root_bus_configure+0x16 configure(0,c1ec00,c1e000,0,c043f475) at configure+0x1b mi_startup() at mi_startup+0x96 begin() at begin+0x2c I know this has been reported and is registered as LOR 026. It has got a status patchet. Doesn't it meen, that I should not get this LOR when it is patched? Could it have be somehow connected to Bugreport #70832 ? (Sorry, if this is a spam :-( ) Marian Cerny -- Marian Cerny Jabber: jojo@njs.netlab.cz [ UNIX is user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are. ]