Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 8 Mar 2017 14:16:18 +0100
From:      Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Dag-Erling =?UTF-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= <des@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r435576 - head/devel/pkgconf
Message-ID:  <20170308141618.68c6f0ec@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
In-Reply-To: <e2a17a43-d9f9-dbc7-a73c-5317440b4357@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201703070103.v2713JtB059883@repo.freebsd.org> <e2a17a43-d9f9-dbc7-a73c-5317440b4357@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 22:02:44 +0100 Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> Le 07/03/2017 =C3=A0 02:03, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav a =C3=A9crit :
>> Author: des
>> Date: Tue Mar  7 01:03:19 2017
>> New Revision: 435576
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/435576
>>
>> Log:
>>   Change the search path to include ${PREFIX}/lib/pkgconfig ahead of
>> the usual ${PREFIX}/libdata/pkgconfig and /usr/libdata/pkgconfig.
>> This renders 82.6% of Mk/Uses/pathfix.mk obsolete.
>=20
> I am wondering how you came to commit this without getting approval
> from portmgr.
>=20
> We always had a policy about putting the pkg-config files in
> libdata/pkgconfig and not in lib.
>=20
> And you just changed that 20 years old policy without even a
> discussion about the repercussions it would have.
>=20
> For example, there is a lot of software around that knows that FreeBSD
> has the .pc files in libdata/pkgconfig, and now, with this, you are
> paving the way to moving things in lib, and I figure we are going to
> need a USES=3Dpathunfix to put things where you changed it.
>=20
>=20
> So, before changing this policy, I am going to ask you, as portmgr, to
> please back the change out.
>=20
>=20
> Once this is done, and if you feel strongly about it, we can always
> discuss changing the policy, and then test that it will not break
> things, and then, maybe change the policy. But only after all those
> steps.

There's a thread on ports@ and arch@ "manpath change for ports ?"
Can you voice your concerns there so we can keep the discussion there?
So far the thread has received nothing but positive feedback.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170308141618.68c6f0ec>