From owner-freebsd-security Mon Jan 29 18:43:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net (albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2419E37B400 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:43:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from pavilion (user-33qtsp5.dialup.mindspring.com [199.174.243.37]) by albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA28822 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:43:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <00c901c08a66$5f1ce3c0$0101a8c0@pavilion> From: "Richard Ward" To: Subject: BIND 9.1 woes Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:43:03 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I just downloaded the BIND 9.1 tarball after hearing about the chaos = with previous versions. I did run into something odd that I can't quite = figure out, it's also mentioned in the 9.1 documentation and I'm sure = some one knows the answer. I managed to start BIND fine, yet digging = through the logs I ran into this line that makes me wonder. entropy.c:948: unexpected error: fcntl(8, F_SETFL, 4): Inappropriate ioctl for device Could some one shed light on this "problem"? Also, when trying to start = BIND 9.1, it will start fine as 'named -g', though when I try to 'named = -u bind -g bind' (so it runs as that user/group) it doesn't launch to = the background, and fails to start period. Any ideas? (Sorry for all the = questions, I just moved from 8.X and am still getting used to the = changes/features) Thanks. Richard Ward mh@maKintosh.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message