From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr  6 15:06:30 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from apollo.emma.line.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D300A1065672
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed,  6 Apr 2011 15:06:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mandree@FreeBSD.org)
Received: by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix, from userid 114)
	id 9C3F625ADB2; Wed,  6 Apr 2011 17:06:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [IPv6:::1])
	by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 335A125AD7B
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed,  6 Apr 2011 13:47:36 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4D9C52D7.90305@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 13:47:35 +0200
From: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
References: <4D9BF27B.1040608@yandex.ru>
In-Reply-To: <4D9BF27B.1040608@yandex.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Fwd: Deprecation campaign
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:06:30 -0000

Am 06.04.2011 06:56, schrieb Ruslan Mahmatkhanov:
> Hi!
> 
> So can please anybody commit this? This patch unbreaks devel/ucpp.
> Build patches are from Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr>.
> (Should be applied with -p0)
> 
> Thanks.

Hi Ruslan,

Have you checked the tarball differences that no nasty code was introduced?

I. e. have you read the diff between the old and new unpacked tarballs?

Any particular reason you haven't filed a PR?

Best
Matthias