Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Jun 2000 16:54:28 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
To:        imp@village.org (Warner Losh)
Cc:        phk@critter.freebsd.dk (Poul-Henning Kamp), mjacob@feral.com, dillon@apollo.backplane.com (Matthew Dillon), freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: SMP discussion moving to freebsd-smp
Message-ID:  <200006211654.JAA28545@usr08.primenet.com>
In-Reply-To: <200006201942.NAA71681@harmony.village.org> from "Warner Losh" at Jun 20, 2000 01:42:17 PM

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> : The meaning here is: No, it can't be basically useless for months
> : on end, but yes, it may be dead for days or maybe even a week.
> 
> Yes.  I agree.  I have no problems with it being bolluxed up for 1 day
> or 1 week or even if it will gain us a lot, 2 weeks.  Beyond that, it
> becomes too painful for me to use the tree.  I susepct others would
> agree with threasholds in this general area, some tigheter some
> looser.

Too bad the source code control tool that FreeBSD uses doesn't
support multiple lines of developement.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006211654.JAA28545>