Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 01:03:23 -0400 From: "Crist J. Clark" <cjc@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> To: Ryan Thompson <ryan@sasknow.com> Cc: Fabio Miranda <fmirand@yahoo.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Full report of network/server Message-ID: <20000504010323.C9561@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005031919330.22383-100000@ren.sasknow.com>; from ryan@sasknow.com on Wed, May 03, 2000 at 07:21:10PM -0600 References: <20000503204015.15444.qmail@web111.yahoomail.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005031919330.22383-100000@ren.sasknow.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 07:21:10PM -0600, Ryan Thompson wrote:
> Fabio Miranda wrote to Ryan Thompson:
[snip]
> > 3. current network status:
> > a. cat /etc/rc.lcoal:
> > /hdlc/utils/hdlccfg /hdlc/utils/eth0.cfg eth0
> > /hdlc/utils/ifhdlc eth0 compress
> > ifconfig eth0 inet 209.88.252.106 209.88.252.105
> > netmask 0xfffffff8
> > ifconfig eth0 alias 209.88.252.113 209.88.252.105
> > broadcast 0xfffffff8
> > route add default 209.88.252.105
> > route add -net 209.88.252.104/29 127.0.0.1
> > route add -net 209.88.252.112/29 127.0.0.1
I am not familiar with HDLC in FreeBSD, but I can say that those last
two manually added routes look _very_ fishy. And below,
> > b. ifconfig eth0
> > eth0: flags=51<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING> mtu 1500
> > inet 209.88.252.106 --> 209.88.252.105 netmask
> > 0xfffffff8
> > inet 209.88.252.113 --> 255.255.255.248
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > netmask 0xffffff00
Is not correct.
--
Crist J. Clark cjclark@home.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000504010323.C9561>