From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 23 19:24:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662C316A4CE; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:24:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16D743D2D; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:24:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1NJOsn5056770; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:24:54 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <421CD80C.8050402@samsco.org> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:22:52 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050218 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav References: <200502231713.j1NHDTug073416@repoman.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200502231713.j1NHDTug073416@repoman.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/libexec/rexecd Makefile rexecd.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:24:49 -0000 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > des 2005-02-23 17:13:29 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > libexec/rexecd Makefile rexecd.c > Log: > Make WARNS=6-clean. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.17 +1 -1 src/libexec/rexecd/Makefile > 1.33 +12 -11 src/libexec/rexecd/rexecd.c It's becoming all too common that increasing the WARNS level winds up breaking the non-i386 tinderbox. Increasing it is a great thing and I definitely encourage it, but it needs to be tested on all platforms before being committed. Scott