Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 07:47:16 +0300 From: Dmitrijs <war@dim.lv> To: Paul Kraus <paul@kraus-haus.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs performance degradation Message-ID: <56038054.5060906@dim.lv> In-Reply-To: <37A37E9D-9D65-4553-BBA2-C5B032163499@kraus-haus.org> References: <56019211.2050307@dim.lv> <37A37E9D-9D65-4553-BBA2-C5B032163499@kraus-haus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2015.09.23. 23:08, Paul Kraus пишет: > On Sep 22, 2015, at 13:38, Dmitrijs <war@dim.lv> wrote: > >> I've encountered strange ZFS behavior - serious performance degradation over few days. >> >> Could it happen because of pool being 78% full? So I cannot fill puls full? >> Can anyone please advice how could I fix the situation - or is it normal? > > So the short answer (way too late for that) is that you can, in fact, not use all of the capacity of a zpool unless the data is written once, never modified, and you do not have any snapshots, clones, or the like. > > P.S. I assume you are not using DeDupe ? You do not have anywhere enough RAM for that. > > -- > Paul Kraus > paul@kraus-haus.org > Thank you very much for explanation. Am I getting it right - it will not work faster even if I add +4Gb RAM to be 8Gb in total? I am not using DeDuplication and compression, neither planing using them. I've also put down a lot of research for situation here: http://forums.nas4free.org/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=9595 In short: you are right, everything getting slowly when pool fills up. So if I plan to work with data a lot, get decent performance and still be sure I'm on the safe side with mirror-raid1, should I choose another filesystem? Especially, if i do not really need snapshots, clones, etc. Or is it not possible at all, and I should put something like raid0 for work and tolerate slow backup on raid1 at nights? best regards, Dmitriy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56038054.5060906>