From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 13 14:44:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA141106568B; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:44:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from mail.terabit.net.ua (mail.terabit.net.ua [195.137.202.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E0B8FC16; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:44:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from skuns.zoral.com.ua ([91.193.166.194] helo=mail.zoral.com.ua) by mail.terabit.net.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1KpOez-000Lm5-89; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:44:37 +0300 Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by mail.zoral.com.ua (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m9DEiOra054675 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:44:24 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m9DEiO6a048430; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:44:24 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id m9DEiOW9048429; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:44:24 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:44:24 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov To: Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav Message-ID: <20081013144424.GU7782@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <200810131300.m9DD0MaR076808@svn.freebsd.org> <20081013131047.GA84887@freebsd.org> <86skr0zlav.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20081013133140.GQ7782@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <86od1oziig.fsf@ds4.des.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4QzzFpAwbwI4hdN6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86od1oziig.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.93.3, clamav-milter version 0.93.3 on skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on skuns.kiev.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Scanned: mail.terabit.net.ua 1KpOez-000Lm5-89 6e6fa0e7c0526847dc15b8347173a7a3 X-Terabit: YES Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, Roman Divacky , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-7@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r183819 - in stable/7/sys: . compat/linprocfs fs/procfs X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:44:39 -0000 --4QzzFpAwbwI4hdN6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 04:17:43PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Kostik Belousov writes: > > Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav writes: > > > Roman Divacky writes: > > > > what about commiting this to note this change? > > > > + A serious problem emulating /proc for Linux was fixed. M= any Linux > > > > + ports are now working including the linux-flashplugin9 port.= > > > "A serious problem was fixed"? Really? And if none of that software > > > worked before this commit, how come they were already in ports? > > I do not think that mentioning of this should appear in release notes, > > but Roman is mostly right in stating the fact. >=20 > Pretend you don't really know the details of the change, and reread > Roman's proposed relnotes entry. Do you think it gives a correct > impression of the nature and severity of the issue? Let me restate what I said above, in more explicit way: 1. The problem fixed actually caused new glibc to fail for threaded linux processes. This is a serious problem for non-default linux-base ports. It is not a serious problem for linprocfs code itself. 2. I oppose against making any promises of the quality of the linux emulator, esp. in the release notes, esp. making a statement that "flash9 works !". --4QzzFpAwbwI4hdN6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkjzXscACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4jfzQCbBOhWiqMGkV2wKwNmDCPTwXTl r60AoI9XIrxnSevAcMZxHlY1SoX+cP7H =Pm9i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4QzzFpAwbwI4hdN6--