From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 29 16:11:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F00106566C for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:11:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.dyndns.org) Received: from qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D74D8FC0C for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:11:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.87]) by qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id yzv11d0061swQuc5A4BMdb; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:11:22 +0000 Received: from koitsu.dyndns.org ([98.248.46.159]) by omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id z4FX1d00E3S48mS3b4FX6i; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:15:32 +0000 Received: by icarus.home.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4B3739B419; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:11:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:11:19 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: Barry Pederson Message-ID: <20100329161119.GA2421@icarus.home.lan> References: <20100215090756.GA54764@icarus.home.lan> <20100215105000.101326yj01j0f64g@webmail.leidinger.net> <20100215122744.GA57382@icarus.home.lan> <20100215161105.14071eiflhc9le68@webmail.leidinger.net> <4B79BA9C.3020402@quip.cz> <4B7AD0A3.9080701@barryp.org> <4BB0BC7C.3000801@barryp.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BB0BC7C.3000801@barryp.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: jhell , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: ZFS Tuning - arc_summary.pl X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:11:22 -0000 On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:43:08AM -0500, Barry Pederson wrote: > From another thread I saw, it sounds like arc_max isn't really > a "Hard Limit" but rather some kind of high water mark. If that's > the case then I wonder if this might make more sense.... It became a hard limit in a semi-recent commit somewhere. I've lost count of the modifications at this point. So, the perl script would have to read __FreeBSD_version in /usr/include/osreldate.h and adjust its output accordingly. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |