Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:29:31 -0800 From: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Mike Barcroft <mike@sparc64.style9.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure Message-ID: <20030227232931.GA84770@HAL9000.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20030227142404.L8428@znfgre.tberna.bet> References: <200302272151.h1RLpIWv018756@sparc64.style9.org> <20030227142404.L8428@znfgre.tberna.bet>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.ORG>: > I made the suggestion in another forum that we create subscription lists > for these tinderbox messages so that those interested could see them, and > those not interested would not need to filter them out. > > Is anyone else interested in doing it that way? Or is this a solution > looking for a problem? I think most people who track -CURRENT are subscribed to current@ precisely because they want to know when things break. Similarly for -STABLE, but that's a moot point because -STABLE doesn't break very often. For people who don't agree with this, there's always procmail; the reports aren't all that frequent that filtering is some sort of burden. I do, however, like the idea of consolidating them and providing more concise summaries. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030227232931.GA84770>