From owner-freebsd-security Wed Oct 13 10:35:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BDE8153D3; Wed, 13 Oct 1999 10:35:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com (p21-dn01kiryunisiki.gunma.ocn.ne.jp [210.132.6.150]) by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) with ESMTP id CAA07517; Thu, 14 Oct 1999 02:35:00 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <3804BF83.A3E8D3@newsguy.com> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 02:21:07 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Stromberg Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, peter@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfilter no longer in -CURRENT, whats the direction? (off to ipfw?) References: <38047FB1.D7B282AD@rtci.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thomas Stromberg wrote: > > It's a shame that no one seems to want to maintain ipfilter in our tree. > As far as a 'port building kld', I think this may not be the 'smartest' > way, seeing as anyone who is running a serious firewall would disable > kld's immediately anyhow. Your concerns notwithstanding, a kld is viable. A kld can be loaded by, well, the loader. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "I always feel generous when I'm in the inner circle of a conspiracy to subvert the world order and, with a small group of allies, just defeated an alien invasion. Maybe I should value myself a little more?" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message